![]() ![]() The technology is 100% good but the interface is assumning too much situations, and not let to avoid a lot of problems. Those are my thoughts after maybe 4000 videos processed. Now every time I have to delete the old preview, go back to normal mode and click. If I changed a value and clicked preview again, it was fine. I also find the new procedure for the video preview much more cumbersome now. But I find it really bad that you can no longer manage and use the AI models offline. Because maybe the picture is clean… but with deinterlacing artifacts, or maybe is well upscaled, but the aspect ratio is not the right and the picture is squeezed. To be honest, I’m still not a fan of the new GUI. If we mix concepts, 50% of times the results are not improving the original. The deinterlace have to be only deinterlace) ![]() I think the problem is the interface should show different stepsġ, input pixel aspect (if not 50% of times we are defforming)Ģ deinterlace (independent of enhancing method. If we have to deinterlace and upscale a video with grain we have to use Dione alghoryhtm that is so bad with the grain… And if we selet proteus or Artemis, the upscale is ok and the degrain is ok, but the deinterlace is destroying the results You are assuming that any video have one problem.īut 90% times the videos have a lot of problems. I want to explain better the issue with the deinterlace. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |